![]() To learn more about the improvements in the 2017.0.2 update click here. Version 2017.0.2, our latest update, includes these improvements to our raw processing just for these cameras as well as support for compressed Fujifiilm Raw files. If you shoot with an X-Series camera, give ON1 Photo 2017.0.2 a try, you’ll really notice the difference compared to your current processing. That may be an important difference between the transformer and developer (which I have, and embeds a camera profile when importing into LR). IXT is much better in the respect of lens corrections, so I always leave this on too. This yielded excellent image quality and processing results from Fujifilm X Series cameras while maintaining our lightning-fast decoding speed. The IXT RAW converted file has all the Fuji film simulations as normal. Check Stock (Opens in a new window) Fujifilm GFX100S Review. Our user feedback has been tremendous in helping our engineers solve both of these issues. The Best Cameras With Fujis Film Simulation Modes. Here is the overview of the image, the area is magnified below for comparison we show. The hardness of these edges must adapt to the strength of detail in the photo so they are strong on hard edges but soft in areas that are out of focus. These are often caused by internal masks used in raw processors to define different tonal ranges. Here are the processing results in that area using ON1 Photo 2017.0.2 and two other raw processors.Īnother processing issue we saw was the odd edges and artifacts in the bokeh, or out of focus regions in certain photos. Here is the overview of the image, the area in red is magnified below for comparison we show below. You can read more about Joel’s thoughts on Fujifilm X-Trans processing in his recent blog post. Here is a great example of this from Joel Wolfson, a respected photographer and writer. Luckily for us we already knew the causes and how to properly solve the problem. Years ago our Genuine Fractals users would get the same smeared look when upsizing their images. This issue was very familiar to us, but in a somewhat different use case. A common refrain we heard was other raw processors often created a smeared or painterly look in areas of texture like grass, bark and rock. When we first started this work we listened to our Fuji users and reviewed the processing results other tools in the market produced. For most cameras there has been years of research to optimize these algorithms for speed, quality and reduced errors (noise). These approaches don’t translate directly to the X-Trans layout which forced our engineers to develop a new and unique algorithm for Fujifilm X Series cameras. Here is what that looks like.įrom a software developers prospective, the way you interpolate, or debayer the raw data from these cameras is quite different from the algorithms we use for most other cameras. They also claim this layout provides for better color reproduction with less color noise. Fujifilm claims this filter layout reduces moire patterns naturally so you don’t need an anti-aliasing filter which can soften details in your photos. These sensors use a unique color filter pattern compared the the traditional Bayer pattern that most cameras use. At least, like Sigma with the Foveon, they at least try.Some of you out there shoot with Fujifilm® X series cameras that use the X-Trans® CMOS sensor. Still a solid option.įuji always liked to try some different approaches on sensor design, like the Super CCD and its numerous incarnations and I respect this. But the Fuji's package is very powerful considering the price and final result. It's a money sink and if you decide to bail out, you'll be screwed.įinal Words In the end, after some years using the X Series, the X-Trans matrix doesn't appear to make any huge improvement over a Bayer (without the AA filter) besides maybe some higher detail on high-frequency zones. I don't like the subscription model trap that Phase One and Adobe adopted. It's evolving but there are better options. ![]() ![]() It will be a money sink in the long run, just do your calculations and check for yourself. Find the setting, turn off the Iridient NR, and compare again. NR in very few converter/editors doesnt reduce detail, softening and/or smearing. Lightroom is almost a religion, and forgive me fanboys, its X-Trans support still sucks in plain 2019 and I would never, ever use a subscription-based software. Iridient has almost no noise, Fuji has a fair amount. I ended up buying C1 for Fujifilm (permanent license) for less than $40. But from time to time, Phase One offers discounts up to 60% on their products and there is a dedicated C1 version that is dedicated to Fujifilm cameras and with those discount tickets, the final cost is very attractive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |